15000 starting chips at 50/100 blinds with 40 min. levels and reentry
to do:
1. delete 5798 hand?
2. AA52 hand - what is 8 (steve's) hand?
8: shows a AQxx (no low) and scoops
3. 35672 board
what's hero's hand?
4. reformat other hands? (and also # of ----)
1371256844956
(840p)
players
1: old nit
2: younger player who I eventually resaw at the WSOP stud/8 event
3: nit?
4: younger player, friends with seat 2
5: "FL" older person who was friends with loud guy I had played 8 game with
6: Jason
7: Bryce
8: Steve
9: hero
---------------
board:
5798
Hero had qt98
was hero in MP?
was it MW? (limped pot)
who was villain? (seat 2?)
do i even include this?
likely checked around flop
hero probably c/f turn
unlikely action: i suspect hero bet flop/gave up on turn/river
---------------
In first rotation around table:
barrelled ak82 r button open
1 (SB): folds
2 (BB): folds
---------------
(villain - Bryce in seat 7 (hero in seat 9))
Isoed KQJ9 (KJ)
Bet 775 two tone
Ace offsuit turn
Isoed for 1750 player behind
3 players to flop
Hero bet 625
EP called bet
Barrelled 1325
On river
Villain leads super small (1k)
hero folds
---------------
12550 from 15k
522 twitter note
100 200 12025
Smart Aggro player IP was pfr (likely seat 5) - raised
2 other players behind (CO/BUT)
Bet 773 (flop?)
Hero oop with a932r (likely sb)
BB limped
hero checks
BB checks
5: bets
2 players fold
hero folds
Analysis:
Hero instead c/f - little chance to scoop
Should hero have c/r flop instead?
---------------
rare preflop sighting
friend in seat 8 repotted preflop OOP then bet HLL board (like J64 two tone). After taking down the pot, he then shows down AA23 double suited (had no flush draw, but had enough equity to call a reraise all in for his stack)
---------------
blinds: 100/200
button: seat 1
Hero been nitty
Hero: dealt AA52 (A5 suited)
(seat 8) had limped
hero raised to 500
1: calls
8: calls
Flop: 963 two tone (hero has no FD)
8: checks
hero bet 1125
1: calls
Turn: 963Q (completes flush)
Check
check
River: 963QQ (completes flush)
Check
Check
8: shows a AQxx (no low) and scoops
hero shows AAxx
Hero's stack: down to 9900
Analysis:
I think this is completely normal to cbet this flop with overpair+nld w/ counterfeit protection. However, it may be a fold if villain was nitty puts money on turn/river (this villain was a bit looser/non-nut peddling though).
---------------
Hero dealt: 9632 963s
folds to hero
hero raises in MP
button calls
5 (SB): calls
(3 players to flop)
Cc
Kq7 two tone (hero has no FD)
Hero bet 1k
CR to 3 fold
Analysis:
Player 5 seemed like a tough/tricky villain. Since 2 high flops are less likely to hit a "tight range" (which was most players' perception of hero), this is a good spot to bluff check raise or semi-bluff check raise with 2p+, maybe wrap+flush draw, nfd, nfd+pair, etc...
In retrospect, it may not have great to cbet this flop....
---------------
hero's stack at 1st break: 7800
---------------
Hero reminder: Note the blind increases!
blinds: 150/300
Hero: dealt A765 (A5 suited)
Hero raised to 500, but was forced to make it 600.
4 way pot
8: pots the high only flop
hero: folds
---------------
blinds: 150/300
Hero: dealt AA66 (A6 suited)
(folds to seat 6)
6: limps
8: hero raises to 1000
everyone else folds
6: calls
(pot: 2450, 2 players)
Qkk8Ar
6: checks
hero checks
6: checks
hero checks
6: bets 750
Hero raises to 3250
6: folds
Analysis:
This seems fine overall.
Flop: A bet will not get called by worse.
Turn: Same (no low is possible)
River: I think bet sizing is ok to try to get value from someone slowplaying Qxxx or a non-nut boat.
---------------
Updated Player Read:
8: eventually busts and replaced by African American (middle aged guy). At this point, people were saying he's fairly aggressive and had shown aggression in some pots.
---------------
703p - blinds: 150/300
Hero dealt in BB: AT63 (A3 suited)
(folds to seat 5)
5: calls
7: calls
sb: calls
hero: checks
(4 players)
flop: T72 two tone on flop (I don't remember exact flop)
Checks around
SB: checks
hero (BB): checks
5: checks behind
turn: T72Q (completes hero nut flush draw)
hero leads 850
everyone folds
Analysis:
Flop: Hero was trying to go for check/raise, but failed. I might have been too hopeful of it in a 4 way pot (especially in a limped pot).
Turn: It's time to try to get value, but there's no value to be found.
---------------
740p: blinds: 200/400
Hero dealt: A982 (A2 suited)
Suited to a2
Hero raised utg
5: Button smart/aggro player bet called
Bryce inbb calls
Check j54r
Hero turns nut flush draw
J543 (hero has NFD)
Checks to button
5: Villain bets
Hero c/r all in
AKT2 r
Hero loses freeroll
7150 at 200 400
Analysis:
Flop: Hero doesn't want to get blown off NLD + non-nut gutshot + BDFD
Turn: Going for a check/raise here seemed right. While an A or 2 isn't the greatest of cards, going for a c/r all in seems best to try to freeroll someone with naked A2.
---------------
834p: blinds: 250/500
Hero's stack: approximately ~6500
KJ44 K4 ss option in bb
3 players
(1500 in pot)
594 two tone
8: checks
hero: checks
5: bets (1000?)
8: calls
hero: calls
(3 players - approx. 4500 in pot)
turn: 5945 two tone
8: checks
Hero: bets 3500?
5: folds
8: calls
(2 players - approx. 11000 in pot)
2000 left
Offsuit k
8: checks river
Hero: bets all in (about 2000)
8: villain folds
Analysis:
Flop: Check/calling flop is standard since board is very draw heavy and no guarantee hero can get others to fold equity.
Turn: It's a cooler to see higher boats here, but hero needs to get value and price out low draws (among other things). Bet sizing might have been better?
River: Standard play to get value from bluff catchers (such as trip 5s) which may check/call.
---------------
moments later:
twitter - 840p
? what did hero even have?
Missed good spot to two barrel on turn river on 35672. I am a fish and should have bet in position. 12600 on 300 600 dinner.
Seat 5's new read: When this hand occurred, I could tell villain was tough player. He said he was playing a ton of 75/150 LO8 and we had played some HORSE in West Palm Beach.
hero dealt: AQJ9 (A9 suited)
(hero did not have low wheel cards, so maybe 4 high suited cards?)
(was there flush draw on board? - probably not)
5: raised in EP
hero: calls in CO
(2 players)
35672 (two tone on turn, hero has no flush draw)
flop:
5: checks?
hero: checks?
turn:
5: checks
hero bet turn (how much) (1700?)
turn:
river:
5: checks
hero tanked and didn't bet the river
villain shows: 2 low pair/bad low draw and scoops
Analysis:
Flop:
Turn: This is a pure bluff with hero's hand and villain had not shown a lot of aggression
River: When villain only calls turn and perfect bluff river card (for counterfeit low) appears, this seems like an easy bet as a bluff.
Villain's hand strength is capped and is actually not very strong because most would have led turn+river with good straights. The board is fairly polarized, especially on the river, to straights and air.
With turn and river bet, hero is repping a straight (likely nut straight). Turn bet/river check indicates non-nut straight w/ counterfeited low.
---------------
(Seat 8, hero in seat 9)
Tweet: Lol literally stole blinds by grabbing small blind chips in blind battle. Oops.
Blinds: 300/600
SB: limps
Hero: announces raise to 2000
Hero was trying to make change to raise to 2000, but just put in 2 * 1000 chips and took all the blinds.
SB eventually folds.
Hero eventually realized this and joked with the table about "literally stealing blinds".
---------------
944p - hero's stack: 12000 at 300/600
---------------
hero: dealt AKQ4 (A4)(KQ) double suited
folds to seat 8
8: limps
9: hero raises to 2000
(other players fold)
8: calls
(2 players - 4900)
flop: T86 (two tone, hero has nut flush draw)
8: checks
9: checks
turn: T86Q (two tone, hero has nut flush draw)
8: bets 4000
hero: raises all in
8: calls
villain: shows AT32
river: T86Q2
Hero: Out
Analysis:
Flop: Checking back seems ok as hero doesn't have a huge amount of equity with naked flush draw/bad low draw.
Turn: Jamming here is pretty standard. It's a cooler to see villain's hand.
---------------
Hero: out (approximately 145/214)
Overall: There were definitely some spots with hero missteps that lost for value.
No comments:
Post a Comment