15000 starting
chips with 50/100 blinds and 30 min levels with reentry
1st table reads:
1 – unknown at
first, then eventually large, young asian player sits here; see player later at
2.5k 10-game
2 - unknown
3 - mid-age asian
player, seemed very aggressive but with high VPIP
4 - older guy
with glasses, found out to be p5er too
5 - person seemed
to overplay nut lows
6 - unknown
7 - hero
8 - pocket fiver
(bigger guy)
9 - younger
person
---------------
Twitter:
Someone already
busted at my table. Standard though. Pretty sick. Also apparently in lag mode.
Three pots won. "
Self note: My
trip report quality has suffered post-twitter. This is a signal to stop posting
on twitter and just write notes on paper. It makes trip report writing that
much tougher.
Unfortunately, no
notes on the bustout hand.
At this juncture,
was getting really premium hands, hitting flops, but unfortunately not getting
stacks.
---------------
level 3: 150/300
blinds
Twitter: 3/4 plo8
fish overvaluing naked a2 with turned straight and nut low. 15k to 27k.
hero: dealt a257
(a25)
5 - limps in MP
6 - hero raises
to 1000
2 other players
call behind hero
(pot: 4000 - 4
players)
flop: 6h 4h 7s
villain pots flop
hero calls
other 2 players
fold
(pot: 12000 - 2
players)
turn: 6h 4h 7s 3s
(two flush on turn, hero has no flush draw)
villain pots turn
hero raises all
in
villain calls
villain shows
a2q4 no suit for pair of 4s/nut low
turn: 6h 4h 7s 3s
9x
hero 3/4 villain
hero's stack: 15k
-> 27k
Analysis: Seems
pretty standard. Some argument for raising on flop, but would prefer to keep multiple
people in.
---------------
Twitter Side
notes:
Pocket five
people. I have never seen people from that community in person.
It sounded like they were part of the OT
community. It was kind of distracting to be honest as they were
"railing" 2 people.
Lol live poker.
Dealer mistakenly mixed up two all in stacks. Players guessed stack sizes
rather than going to camera.
Dealers apparently were really tired (working
huge numbers of shifts and 30+ consecutive days)
---------------
Level 5 Chip
Count (first break)
27k going to
300/600 level
---------------
Twitter:
I apparently
forgot everything and check called squeeze against aahh with aq92 With suit.
Back door low. Should have not been in to start.
(hero was in sb)
Hero dealt: aq92
(A9)
relevant stack
sizes:
co: ~10k
hero: 40k
bb (seat 8): ~12k
1 limper
co: raises to
2400
hero: calls
bb: raises pot to
9900 (leaving 3k behind)
co: folds
hero:
tanks/raises AI
bb: calls - shows
AAHH (ex) AAQJ w/ suit)
board: QJ537
hero gets half
Analysis: Hero
made (small-medium sized) mistake not folding, IMO. Villain seemed straight
forward TAG, so squeeze is at least AAHH.
IDK, there's
definitely some argument with just flipping, but hero's guess of edge on this
table seemed fairly high at that point. Also, at this juncture w/ PLO8
structure, it's not mandatory to just "60/40 underdog" flip.
Prior to this
trip, ran equity sims and knew that if villain's range was perceived as very
tight, this is a leak given hero's actual hand against aaxx.
Omaha Hi/Lo
Simulation ?
600,000 trials
(Randomized)
Hand Equity Scoops Wins Hi Ties
Hi Wins Lo Ties Lo
AA 60.57% 249,443 421,968 7,705 74,863 43,761
As Qh 9s 2c 39.43% 134,621 170,327 7,705 177,981 43,761
Omaha Hi/Lo
Simulation ?
600,000 trials (Randomized)
Hand Equity Scoops Wins Hi Ties
Hi Wins Lo Ties Lo
AA$w 62.28% 254,967 420,857 8,327 91,347 68,016
As Qh 9s 2c 37.72% 127,307 170,816 8,327 142,689 68,016
---------------
Villain seemed
like younger player and competent PLO8 player from previous conversation.
Hero dealt A3Bx
(A3 suited) - ex) AQT3
folds to hero in
MP
hero raised in MP
to 1000
villain calls on
button
(2 players - 3000
in pot)
KQ5 (monotone;
hero has nut flush)
hero bets 2/3 pot
villain called IP
(2 players - pot:
7k)
KQ57 (monotone -
3 to flush)
hero checked turn
villain checked
behind
(2 players - pot:
7k)
KQ57T (4 flush)
hero bets river
(6500)
villain says
"if you h=ad flush, you would have bet turn for protection" and calls
hero shows nut
flush
villain
"says had a2" and mucks.
Hero’s stack up
to 37.5k.
Analysis:
TBH, villain was
probably lieing.
Slow play on turn
is definitely not standard line (bet turn to price out naked lows), but seemed
like good proposition because:
a) sometimes
villain has worse low (and won't get 1/4 anyway)
b) sometimes
villain will bet turn (floating hero/picked up low draw) and hero can
check/raise AI
Downsides:
a) lose value from other flushes
a) lose value from other flushes
It definitely
worked out in this spot.
hero's stack:
37.5k
---------------
Twitter:
Bet size fail
against aggro MTT player. Jj6 two tone.
Villain was seat
3 who had built up a fairly large stack, but had high VPIP/PFR.
TBH, Hero's cards
don't really matter other than hero flopped air.
folds to hero in
HJ
Hero has: ~15%
hand (AQ73 with suit)
hero raised in MP
but was called by seat 3 in BB.
villain calls in
BB
Flop: JJ6 two
tone
villain checks
hero bets 3/4 pot
villain check
raises about 2/3 pot
hero folds
Analysis:
Hero bet too
large (3/4 pot) and was check raised.
Alternatives:
1. check flop;
bet turn
2. bet closer to
1/2 pot would have done the same thing.
---------------
Hero has 31k
Villain has 15k
to start
villain: P5er to
my left. Villain was talking about his WSOP PLO8 MTT experience yesterday.
Blinds: 400/800
Folds to hero in
SB
Hero raises with
AQ65 with 4 to suit
Villain calls
(2 players - 4k
in pot)
Flop: QJ4 with
hero flush draw
Hero bets ~2.5k
Villain raises to
~10k
Hero 3bets all in
Villain calls
Villain shows
AJ44
Hero bricks and
is down to 16k.
Analysis:
Hero was kind of
upset when hand initially played out.
Looking back:
Effective SPR = 4
Villain's jamming
range could be wide in sb/bb, although villain seemed straight forward/tag.
With conservative
villain jam range, definitely a bet/call seems right.
Omaha Hi/Lo
Simulation ?
600,000 trials
(Randomized)
board: qd js 4s
Hand Equity Scoops Wins Hi Ties
Hi Wins Lo Ties Lo
as qs 6s 5s 40.75% 201,175 205,789 4,025 151,355 1,929
qq, jj, 44,
aktss, qj 59.25% 312,844 390,186 4,025 8,898 1,929
---------------
Hero picked up
some chips as a PFR before table broke.
Hero moved to new
table with 21k.
Twitter note:
Lol. Drunk maniac
just shipped with akq6 one suit versus tight player with aa69 one suit. Two
pair suckout by villain.
Note: One player
literally had no idea what they were doing (seat 6, as hero was in seat 8).
Hero picked up no
hands and moved to level 9 break.
---------------
13.5k at 1k 2k.
Short stack ninja mode at level 9
*Fun story:
I briefly did a
multi-table and helped a friend I met at previous PLO8 MTTs start a 1-3 game
while his girlfriend was still in the MTT (and at my table).
I bought in for
500 at 1/3 PLO8 and clocked 3 hands before going back to MTT.
---------------
Same villain
(seat 6 maniac)
seat 6: raises
Hero flatted for
50% stack with A962 (A2)
BB: calls
(3 players - ~19k)
A27 two tone
hero checks
BB checks
(3 players - ~19k)
A27T two tone
all players check
(3 players - ~19k)
A27TA
Hero bets AI for
1/3 PSB
BB: folds
6: calls
6: shows A237 and
scoops
Analysis:
Honestly, no
complaints about being able to see flop with 1/3 PSB left.
It's a cooler to
have walked into better boat, IMO. Only getting half from a low seemed more
likely.
Hero busted in
95/236 entries.
---------------
After busting
from MTT, hero wandered around, then went back and played the 1/3 PLO8 cash
game for about 45 min. There were no interesting hands of note.
My friend
mentioned the game was good while I was walking around (person dropped 2
buyins, then left), which was sad...
No comments:
Post a Comment